Re: Prompt action needed to protect the Fundamental Rights of People

CJ Number:	72884
Title:	Why Men Rape
Corporate Author:	National Film Board of Canada United States
Project Director:	R Kroitor
Date Published:	1979
Sponsoring Agency:	Learning Corporation of America New York, NY 10019 National Film Board of Canada New York, NY 10020 Not Available Through National Institute of Justice/NCJRS Document Loan Program Rockville, MD 20849
Sale Source:	Learning Corporation of America 1350 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 United States Not Available Through National Institute of Justice/NCJRS Document Loan Program Rockville, MD 20849 United States
Language:	English
Country:	United States
Annotation:	Produced for high school and college students, this Canadian documentary film analyzes rape from the perpetrator's viewpoint.
Abstract:	Interviews with 10 convicted rapists, now in prisons or psychiatric hospitals, reveal that they come from all age levels and represent a variety of social and educational backgrounds. The film investigates the phenomenon of 'social rape,' which involves people who know each other socially. In social rape, the victim often trusts the man who assaults her. Most victims of social rpae do not report the incidents. The cases discussed by the 10 rapists differ from social rape in that the rapists did not know their victims. All of their raping experiences involved extreme violence. Rape is defined as forcing a woman into a sex act against her will by using physical and/or mental intimidation. The victim is so terrorized that she becomes afraid to resist. These men's reasons for raping stem from feelings of rejection, real rejection, emotional insecurity and immaturity, brutality experienced during childhood, and an unloving or emotionally sterile home environment. The film discusses specific crimes, the reasons the men committed them, and how the men were caught. The film points out that rape is an act of hate in which the rapist tries to degrade the woman. Several students also discuss their attitudes and feelings about sex, social encounters, and rape. The audience can compare these views with those of the rapists. Suggestions for preventing rape include more open discussion of sex in the family, in school, and in mixed groups; more sharing of feelings about sex and sex problems with others; and helping children grow up without contempt for themselves so that they will see each person as truly worthwhile. A film guide is provided.
Index Term(s):	Audiovisual aids; Rape; Rapists
Note:	Color, 16 mm film, 40 mins, also available for rental
	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=72884

On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Ravi Partha <pravi202@gmail.com> wrote:

To:

JUSTICE VERMA
Chief Judge of India,
E-mail - justice.verma@nic.in

fax: 011-23092675

Sub: Orders to Chief Judge of India from a Common Citizen of India

1. Under the Preamble of Constitution, a citizen of India is sovereign and empowered to send orders to President, Prime Minister and Supreme Court judge of India or any employee of the sovereign on any matter in which the citizen thinks that prompt due action needed to protect the fundamental rights are not being taken. So under Preamble of Constitution, I am doing my duty as a citizen.
and sending you following orders 
2. Please issue order to Sessions Court judge of Delhi to move the case of recent rape-case, which happened in a bus in New Delhi on 16-dec-2012, to the fast court courts.
3. Please issue order to Sessions Court judge of Delhi, to take narco-test of the convicts and post full recording on YouTube after removing names of the victims.
4. Please issue order to Sessions Court judge of Delhi, that that fast track court should have only one case so that that case is disposed speedily
5. Please also post the cell phone number provided by Government to you on the website of Supreme Court of India so that henceforth we the people of India can send necessary orders to you via SMS. The cell phone provided via Government, and whose bill is paid by Government is public property and so under RTI, this phone number should be disclosed to public. Also, please put the SMS orders received from the citizens on website of Supreme Court of India.
6. Proposed Transparent Complaint / Evidence filing in Courts-
======================================
(Info: eg: this could be filled by any rape victim, from any district, the complaint / evidences cannot suppressed, and within a day visible to any citizen )
A. Orders for the District Collector
==========================
The High Court hereby orders the District Collector that : A woman voter or any citizen-voter can submit a complaint or any affidavit in District Collector Office with an affidavit for a fee of Rs 20 per page and ask the District Collector or his clerk to scan and put the complete affidavit on the website of the High Court.
B Orders to the Talati aka Patwari aka Village officer
======================================
B1 The High Court orders every Talati (Patwari / village officer) that : if a woman voter or ANY citizen-voter comes with voter ID, and specifies Yes-No on an PIL posted on the website of High Court, then the Talati or his clerk will enter his Yes-No on the website of High Court with his voter-ID and give a printed receipt for Rs 3 fee. The Clerk will also allow citizen to change his Yes-No for Rs 3 fee. The fee will be Re 1 for BPL card holder.
B2 The High Court will order Talati to also allow citizen-voter to cancel his YES/NO without any charge, ANYDAY.
B3 The High court may order the collector create a system of taking finger-print and picture of the citizen-voter and putting it on the receipt.
B4 High Court may order the collector to enable citizen-voters to register YES/NO via SMS for 5 paise
C (Information To all Citizens) 
=======================
This is not a referendum procedure. The Yes-No count will not be a binding on the High court judges etc.
7. Please suggest to the PM to print some Gazette Notifications -
7.1 Jury trial – For quick, fair judgements. 
==========================
The trial of rape must be decided by Jury of 25 randomly chosen citizens, between 30 years and 55 years, of the district in which crime was committed. The Jury will be formed by an officer titled as District Jury Administrator who will be appointed by High Court Chief judge and can be recalled\replaced by citizen-voters of that district.
(Procedure-draft in chapter 21, www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

)
7.2 Narco Test in Public
==============
To prove or disprove whether rape was committed, narco tests on rape accused should be conducted in public after Jury has seen reasonable incriminating evidences.
1. All rape cases will be tried by Jury and Jury only. The Jury will consists of 25 citizens between 30 years and 55 years of age chosen at random from the district, and at least 13 will be women.
2. If the accused himself wants or if 13 out of 25 Jurors deem necessary to have truth serum test on the accused, then the investigating officer will conduct truth serum test on the accused.
3. If complainer wants, then and then only, then the investigating officers will conduct truth serum test on the complainer. The complainer will not be asked to take truth serum test against her will unless 13 out of 25 jurors demand narco test.
Procedure-Draft -https://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=401838393168501
7.3 Right to Recall Deputy-Commissioner for crimes against women :
==========================================
Every district must have a Deputy Police Commissioner (or DySP) in-charge of crimes against women and women in the district should have right to recall that DyCP or DySP . Only an anti-woman activist will oppose this proposal. (Procedure-draft in chapter 22,www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

)
7.4 . Right to Recall Lower Court, High Court and Supreme Court judges in-charge of crimes against women : 
============================================
Every district must have 3 judges in-charge of crimes against women, and women of district should have right to recall them. Same at High Court and Supreme Court levels. (Procedure-draft in chapter 7,www.righttorecall.info/301.pdf

)

Thanking you,

Yours Truly,

    RAVINDRAN PARTHASARATHY